Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Questions, Part 4: Buddhism and Destiny

Question: What is the relationship between karma and destiny?

Answer: Do we shape destiny by clinging to a long-stored visualization, or is this predestiny? If we shape our destiny, is that very act itself predestiny? Do we dimly recognize the force of karma and then eventually succumb to an inevitable result? Do we “program” a result by a repetitive pattern of thinking, and if so, at what point in what lifetime?

Intellectually, I believe that karmic consequence and predestination are empty issues, liable to interruption in the way clouds are interrupted by strong sunlight. Experientially, I see that we are constantly shaping our lives by our transient beliefs— and these can be conscious or subconscious beliefs—and we do so habitually, through the stream of lifetimes without beginning or end.

Earlier, I told you about the Wheel of Sharp Weapons. This text begins with a magnificent image:

“In jungles of poisonous plants strut the peacocks
Though medicine gardens of beauty lie near.
The masses of peacocks do not find gardens pleasant,
But thrive on the essence of poisonous plants.
In similar fashion, the brave Bodhisattvas
Remain in the jungle of worldly concern.
No matter how joyful this world’s pleasure gardens,
These Brave Ones are never attracted to pleasures,
But thrive in the jungle of suffering and pain.
We spend our whole life in the search for enjoyment,
Yet tremble with fear at the mere thought of pain;
Thus since we are cowards, we are miserable still.
But the brave Bodhisattvas accept suffering gladly
And gain from their courage a true lasting joy.
Now, desire is the jungle of poisonous plants here.
Only Brave Ones, like peacocks, can thrive on such fare.
If cowardly beings, like crows, were to try it,
Because they are greedy they might lose their lives.
How can someone who cherishes self more than others
Take lust and such dangerous poisons for food?
If he tried like a crow to use other delusions,
He would probably forfeit his chance for release.
And thus Bodhisattvas are likened to peacocks:
They live on delusions—those poisonous plants.
Transforming them into the essence of practice,
They thrive in the jungle of everyday life.
Whatever is presented they always accept,
While destroying the poison of clinging desire.
Uncontrollable wandering through rounds of existence
Is caused by our grasping at egos as real.
This ignorant attitude heralds the demon
Of selfish concern for our welfare alone:
We seek some security for our own egos;
We want only pleasure and shun any pain.
But now we must banish all selfish compulsion
And gladly take hardship for all others’ sake.
All of our sufferings derive from our habits
Of selfish delusions we heed and act out.
All of us share in this tragic misfortune,
Which stems from our narrow and self-centered ways.
We must take all our sufferings and the miseries of others
And smother our wishes of selfish concern.
Should the impulse arise now to seek our own pleasure,
We must turn it aside to please others instead;
For even if loved ones should rise up against us,
We must blame our self-interest and feel it’s our due.”

I do not know what else to say. Maybe I can propose the wonderful idea that we are all Bodhisattvas, some veiled, some incipient, some manifest at various stages, some overt, some covert.

Maybe—if we truly accept the concept of bodhicitta, which we can reduce to the very simple notion that we are inherently good beings momentarily disturbed by wrong ideations—the only predestiny is that predestiny, and karmic imputations are pebbles on the path. Maybe, as we gobble lust and dangerous poisons, we complicate something very simple and make the pebbles into mountains we then must climb in order to make any progress.

We make our own suffering, do we not?

We make our suffering with our very notions of progress, thinking only of ourselves, and not of others. Are our habitual sufferings predestiny?

A habit can be abandoned, and if it were the cause of a destiny, that destiny would be changed. An intention can be abandoned. A pattern can be interrupted. Clearly, in this light, any construct of predestination is impermanent and mutable, like the wind.

We are human.
We are mutable.
We create ourselves with our minds.

From the moment of birth, our bodies begin reaching toward death. Eventually, our bodies succumb.
Nevertheless, does the mind die?
If I chop off my hand with an axe, does my mind die?
Who is the “my” that seemingly owns this mind?
Where does this “my” reside, and what does it consist of?
Who or what knows this “my?”
Where does this knowledge reside?

If there is such a thing as predestination, what owns this predestination, what contains this predestination, what decides this predestination, and what does this predestination occupy?

You and I are identical, self-replicating models of each other.
You and I are interchangeable.
Isn’t my predestiny also your predestiny in some over-arching
sense?
You are great and I am small. You are black and I am white.
You are rich, and I am poor. But you and I are traveling in the
same space, at the same time, on the same road, to the same
destination.

The things we do, eh?

How we hurt and injure each other.

Sisters turn against brothers and brothers turn against each
other.
Children turn against parents.
Husbands turn against wives, and wives turn against husbands.
Families turn against families.
Cities turn against their citizens.
Nations turn against nations, then turn against themselves.
Religions turn against religions.
Races turn against races.
All in the name of right and wrong, and it has been ever thus.
Is that predestination?

The only predestination we might ever find in this life is love, but we struggle against this love as if it were an enemy. Eventually, it overcomes us, too late to undo the damage we have done.

Maybe you have had the same experience?

Maybe we should stop struggling and permit another, better experience to arise.

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Questions, Part 3: Buddhism and Abortion

Question: You mention abortion. What is the Buddhist view of contraception and abortion?

Answer: That is simple. Sentient life begins when consciousness enters the womb, i.e. the moment of conception. Contraception merely prevents the consciousness from entering, so this is acceptable. However, abortion is murder. Abortion is explicitly mentioned in the Vinaya Pitaka as a most serious offense. The Buddhist prohibition against abortion is absolutely clear and unequivocal. Make no mistake about that.

Question: What about therapeutic abortion, to save a mother’s life, or to terminate a triploidic fetus, for example.

Answer: I do not know the answer. By triploidic fetus, I assume you are referring to chromosome trisomies like 13, 18, 21, 22, and so forth. Life expectancy of some of these, like Down Syndrome babies, is forty to fifty years, assuming there are no major heart defects. Edwards’ Syndrome babies survive only a few months. Patau’s Syndrome babies usually die within six months. I really do not know how to assess this, as it is a fine moral point. It would seem that, in the events you postulate, we are making a judgment about the relative worth of one life over another life. I do not know how to do this. We are also making a quality of life judgment.

If, for example, we fail to terminate a fetus with trisomy of chromosome 13—which occurs in about one out of every 5,000 births—we are running a seventy percent chance that the baby will die in six months, and about an eighty percent chance that the baby will not survive beyond one year. Regardless of survival, the baby will be severely deformed, and severely retarded. These cases are horrible. They can tear out your heart.

Still, how do we know that we benefit this being by terminating its suffering? Maybe we benefit the parents, but do we really benefit this miserable creature? This is a decision we make for ourselves.

Speaking hypothetically, I might terminate that fetus and take the karmic consequences, whatever they may be. You might have another idea. I cannot say that I am right and you are wrong. Maybe we are both right. Maybe we are both wrong.

The issue of saving a mother’s life offers the same moral dilemma. How do we benefit one life at the cost of another? A large number of women have died giving birth to healthy babies that lived long, productive lives. We interfere in another’s karma on this point. Again, are we right or wrong?

There is also the issue of miracles and mistakes. We may be operating on mistaken information. We may be forestalling a miracle. In medicine, as I am pleased to assure you, miracles happen more frequently than you might suppose. I have seen such strange, unimaginable things, that I conclude anything is possible. Regardless of how many points we raise, the issue comes down to cause and effect. The broad issue is karma. The narrow question is this: do we, as individual human beings, have the moral duty and the ethical right to intercede in another sentient being’s karmic continuum to the extent of terminating that being’s life?

If we read the narratives of the Bodhisattvas’ lives, or the Buddha’s former lives, we find instances where the Buddha and the Bodhisattvas have gone to this extent. I once asked Kalu Rinpoche a question along this line. He responded by telling the famous story that demonstrates a Bodhisattva’s willingness to risk his own karma; killing a person, in order to prevent that person from creating very negative karma.

Suppose you are a policeman. You walk into a store and you find the storekeeper holding a gun on a thief, while the thief is holding a gun on the storekeeper. You draw your own weapon. What do you do now? Do you shoot the thief to prevent him from shooting the storekeeper? Do you shoot the storekeeper to prevent him from shooting the thief? Do you order them both to lay down their weapons? What if they refuse? Will you shoot them? What if one of them shoots you? How do you know who is the storekeeper and who is the thief?

The thing is, there is no single right answer to any or all of these questions. These are matters beyond right and wrong, beyond the law of men. These are matters of the law of karma.

Decisions to take life cannot be based on compassion alone.

These decisions cannot be made solely on best intentions.

These decisions must be accompanied by wisdom and insight.

It is also important to remember that regardless of the intention, the degree of compassion, and the degree of wisdom and insight involved, the actions born of such decisions will earn certain results.

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Questions, Part 2: Buddhism and Falun Gong

Question: The Buddha Fa people believe the practice of healing is wrong, and their leader says he will withdraw his protection if people practice healing. What do you think that means?

Answer: That is a very interesting question. Having once resolved to protect someone, why would you even consider abandoning your intention? That seems rather puerile and petulant, does it not?

You are talking about the Falun Dafa movement. This is really an indigenous Chinese social issue, which proceeds from what I perceive as the tragedy of modern Chinese Buddhism.

Because I am not very fluent with all the nuances, it is difficult for me to comment. What I suspect is that their movement is a reaction to cultural peculiarities that are operative in Mainland China.

They begin with the thesis that no Dharma is definitive and extend this to mean that the Tathagata’s teachings are no longer applicable to this age.

That is absurd.

The word “dharma,” translates as truth. Dharma is therefore the law of truth, and when I use the word “law,” I do so on the scientific level. Truth is truth, and that is definitive. They point to Buddhas at levels higher than Tathagata, as if the concept of levels was continuously operative past a fully enlightened condition. This bespeaks a fundamental misunderstanding.

All Buddhism is defined by taking refuge from suffering in the Buddha, an enlightened being, the Dharma, a law of truth, and the Sangha, a company of similarly situated believers. Taking refuge means embracing the Buddha, Dharma, and Sangha as your guide, method, and companions on the road out of suffering. This is what defines a Buddhist. If you cannot manage
to take this step, please do not call yourself a Buddhist.

My argument with the Falun Dafa view of healing is their apparent belief that some concrete “I” is involved: their apparent belief that somebody is involved in possessing something. There
is also a substantial amount of misinformation about the Higher Yoga Tantras. Here again, this is so wrapped up in modern Chinese cultural constructs that it is difficult to unravel.

For example: they say that if an image of the Buddha has not been consecrated, it should not be worshipped. First, all images of the Buddha are Nirmanakaya, and in that sense are self-consecrated. Second, Buddhists do not worship statues. Shakyamuni did not like statues, and did not want statues, which is why the early iconography is confined to his footprints. Even there, it was a judgment call by his followers, after his death. Still, people went ahead with statues, out of a sense of longing or loneliness I suppose. Buddhists respect statues. Statues are holy objects, but they are ultimately just reminders, or a prop to focus your visualizations. However, I look at the crop of “instant antique” statues that are being produced in China and I clearly see the traditional forms are being corrupted. This is particularly true with Tibetan Buddhist art, where the Chinese forgers are becoming unduly creative. I am intimately familiar with the iconography of Buddhism, and I clearly see that the Chinese forgers are sneaking in their own inventions. Therefore, perhaps the Falun Dafa people are just reacting to that in a culturally specific manner.

This corruption extends past imagery into the field of medicine. The savaging of Buddhist medicine by China is a story that will bring tears to any civilized person’s eyes. Again, maybe the Falun Dafa people are reacting to this.

Falun Dafa people argue that karma is an actual substance. They believe this substance is other-dimensional. Maybe that is true and maybe it is not. Still, karma is not something you can buy and sell, and to the issue of medicine, karma is not a give and take proposition. If I could take karma, I would immediately take everybody’s karma, without hesitation. Harking back to an earlier question, maybe that is what Jesus tried to do, but you see, it may have worked in one sense but it did not work in all senses. I believe what the Falun Dafa people are trying to say, is do not cultivate Buddhism to ostentatiously go about claiming miracles. That is generally good advice. That is probably a reaction to all the spurious Qigong healers, who infest China like a plague of locusts.

I think if the Falun Dafa people consider karma a little more deeply, they will find their local conditions have a cause, and that cause is probably related to what happened in Tibet. If people
believe the destruction of Tibet by China is without karmic consequences to China as a society, they are very sadly mistaken indeed. I do not believe that China, as we understand it, will survive past three and a half more centuries, and I know for a certainty that China will eventually be torn asunder.

In our generation, we have developed very advanced knowledge of plate tectonics. Science informs us that the Asian continent will rift in two, through the very middle of China. Naturally, this will not happen for several million years, but it is something to ponder. These are inescapable, evolutionary energies. These same energies have formed the world we now inhabit. Things are, after all, impermanent are they not?

The danger in taking Falun Dafa too literally is that one misses the opportunity to put compassion into action.

If you have the ability to heal, then you should heal.

If you are moved to cultivate the ability to heal, then you should do so.

The opposite of killing is healing, and just as killing bears a certain fruit so does healing.

Actually, the practice of healing encompasses the simultaneous practice of six perfections, so it is a very powerful performance. You are simultaneously exercising the perfection of giving, ethics, patience, effort, concentration and wisdom.

What can be wrong with that?

Having said all of this, I want to mention that regardless of whether or not Falun Dafa is pure Buddhism or corrupted Buddhism, or even a dire form of covert warfare, there is absolutely no excuse for the violence being done to Falun Dafa followers by the Chinese internal security apparatus. The majority of these people are well meaning and I am sure they are proceeding from the intention to do something positive with their lives. Chinese Buddhism has already been thoroughly polluted by the Communist Party, and the Party has had its wrecking crew at work on Tibetan Buddhism for some time now with mixed results. Therefore, these people simply do not have anywhere else to turn. Their thirst for the Dharma is so intense, they take what they find. I just want to caution them to evaluate what they find with common sense, and not be carried away.

Strong faith is good, but intelligent faith is better.

Question: The Falun Dafa leader, Li Hongzhi, claims he is a Buddha. Is this possible?

Answer: Yes, it is possible. We all have that potential. I do not want to speculate about the probability. I do not think it serves any purpose. Maybe he should work very, very hard to show that he is. There is also an ex-junkman from Taiwan, who retired from the scrap metal business and now claims he is Padmasambhava, so maybe we should let the mainland and the island work it out among themselves.

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Questions, Part 1: Buddhism and Christianity

This post inaugurates a new series, wherein I publish questions and responses to questions that have been posed by readers, attendees at lectures, and so forth. Hope this is of some small benefit.

-------

Question: Would you say that Jesus and Buddha were the same?

Answer: Same in what sense? Please understand that in my religion, as it has evolved, Jesus is considered an influential Bodhisattva. In Christianity, as it has evolved, there is no corresponding idea about Buddha, at least among the mass of followers. There is all sort of language in the Bible that points to a jealous God, and so forth. There is a great deal of violent imagery, about fighting, and retribution, some of it almost Vedic in the most bloodthirsty sense, whereas in Buddhism we do not have so many tortured symbols. Jesus is nailed to a cross, and Buddha is sitting under a tree. We of course have wrathful deities, and wrathful images, but this has to be appreciated in context.

Now, to be fair, Jesus appears roughly 500 years after the historical Buddha, Shakyamuni—that is the most conservative, modern interpretation of Buddhist history—and a lot can happen in that time. For example, if we look back 500 years, we are in the 1500s. In the 1500s, we cannot imagine technology as it exists in this century. We have no frame of reference.

Similarly, by the time of the Cult of Jesus, conditions have changed in Buddhism and we have examples of gifted Buddhists who are managing to get themselves thrown into pits of fire. I therefore cannot criticize Christian imagery too much, as it probably reflects its time.

I cannot say that Jesus and Buddha are the same, because I am a simple-minded Buddhist and I believe that Buddha was fully enlightened whereas Jesus, however gifted, was not a Buddha. Maybe if I was a different sort of Buddhist I could say that Jesus was one of Buddha’s manifestations.

I have a prejudice to overcome. I tend to evaluate a teaching by its results. When I look at Christianity, I see a great deal of suffering and bloodshed. The Christian saints, for example, are evaluated by how well they suffered and reached salvation. This has no parallel in my world. Buddhist saints are evaluated by how well they reached salvation and ceased suffering. However, I can certainly see and accept rich communion between Mahabodhisattvas and Jesus.

I personally think Jesus was probably a Mahabodisattva. If he wasn’t, he certainly tried.

Question: So is Jesus related to Buddha?

Answer: Philosophically? Yes and no. Jesus says he is the Son of God. Buddha is not God, neither is Buddha a God, if you follow the distinction. Somebody asked Buddha, “Are you a man or a god?” Buddha replied, “I am awake.” Yet, to the extent that Buddha is Buddha, maybe Jesus was Buddha’s son. This would be son in the philosophical sense. Jesus is reputably born of a virgin womb, which is certainly provocative in Buddhist terms. In a sense, he is uncreated. Maybe Jesus is a face of time.

You know, there are certainly some interesting things you can find if you know where to look.

For example: Jesus is hungry and he sees a fig tree. There are leaves on this tree, so he thinks there may be figs to eat. He looks, and finds none, so he curses the fig tree and it immediately withers. I think that story is in the Bible, in the Book of Mark. Contrast this with the Four Glances, mentioned in the Hevajra Tantra, which predates Jesus by centuries, and the commentary by Ngawang Lozang: “The measure of one’s attainment in the four glances is as follows: with just a glance to dry up a tree, that its fruit does not ripen, and overthrow it upon the ground... .” There are all sorts of things like that.

Again, we have to understand that Jesus appears a few hundred years after Buddha, and it defies critical thought and historical evidence if we believe that Buddhist philosophy had no influence on the evolution of Near Eastern philosophies and philosophers. When I read the Bible, I very clearly see that there was philosophical contact between the Near East and Southern Asia. For example: you can see this in the Bible’s criticism of yoga—and if you take this as a hermeneutic matter, it speaks volumes about the chronologies involved. I mean, date yoga and then date the Bible.

Question: The Christian God is the one true God. Yes or no?

Answer: Many people have felt that way for the last 2,000 years. Still, there have been a great many other “true gods” who have held sway and explained things for much longer periods than the Christian God has. The Christians believe their God has refuted the existence of any other gods. I do not understand why the process of refutation stopped with one, and why the Christian God did not refute its own existence, but apparently that is where the Christian philosophy terminates.

I suggest you read the Bible and make your own decision.

I am not particularly qualified to make comment in this area.

I just know there is a lot of Buddhism in the Bible, if you know what to look for. Read 1 Corinthians 13, for example. Or take Titus 1:15, which says, “To the pure all things are pure, but to those who are defiled and unbelieving nothing is pure; but even their mind and conscience are defiled.” That is an essential Vajrayana Buddhist premise. There is no difference between Christianity and Buddhism on this point, so you see, there might be some ground for dialogue.

Question: Did you ever hear that Jesus studied Buddhism, or that he knew
Buddha, or that he studied in Tibet? Could it be true?

Answer: I heard that. Supposedly, there are “lost years,” or something like that, correct? Actually, I have heard all sorts of fanciful legends to the effect that there are secret records about Jesus buried under the Potala, in Lhasa, or that the Dalai Lama passed secret messages about Jesus to the Pope, and so forth.

I do not think such notions can pass the test of history.

Shakyamuni Buddha dies in 881 BCE, according to the traditional view, or 483 BCE, according to the view of Western historians. Alexander the Great goes adventuring through Asia with 60,000 heavily armed Macedonians, slaps Babylon along the way, and winds up in India in 327 BCE. Around 112 BCE the Silk Road opens.

The first Buddhist texts arrive in Tibet only around 433 CE, when Jesus has been dead for about four centuries, and the foundations of Buddhism in Tibet are only traced to the seventh century CE. The main problem is that Buddhism in Tibet only takes hold at the time of Padmasambhava’s arrival, which is the eighth century—or 762 CE to be exact—when Jesus is reportedly sitting next to God.

Any contact between the historical, temporal Jesus and Buddhism is going to be confined to the last years of the first century BCE and is going to be a product of philosophical crossfertilization arising along the Silk Road, with all sorts of Greek overtones. There were indeed Indian Buddhist missionaries active at that time—this was the time of the Kusana Empire, if I am not mistaken, and this was a time of royal sympathy for Buddhism—but there were certainly no Tibetan Buddhist missionaries for the simple reason that there were no Tibetan Buddhists—or at least none we know about.

Maybe Jesus met Padmasambhava. Maybe Jesus was Padmasambhava in disguise. That is a possibility, but the issue of probability is up for grabs. I do not think the germane issue is whether Jesus studied Buddhism or not, or whether he knew Padmasambhava or not. I think the germane issue is if the people who wrote the Bible ever had any contact with Buddhism. I believe they did, but I do not think this occurred on any meaningful level. If it had, they would have been Buddhists, not Christians. Still, I will repeat what I said before: there is Buddhism in the Bible, and it had to come from somewhere. My suspicions rest on the influence of Alexander and his contemporaries. The more you study Alexander, the more you come to realize what a profound effect he had on religion and medicine, to name but two areas.

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Saturday, September 22, 2007

The Symbol Is Dissolved


By an early autumn morning’s rainbows
reprised in the rainbows
of midsummer’s late afternoon—
one in perfect happiness,
the other in perfect sorrow—
so comes from the remembered valley
on the whispered prayer of sunlight,
a dream, declared to River Sky
in which there is no shadow’s slippery promise:
where I first beheld you
and behold, beneath you,
struggling from the water into a cloud,
the purple basilisk which comes but once
before the symbol is dissolved.

Copyright (c) 2003 by Tulku Urgyan Tenpa Rinpoche. Rights reserved.

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Poem for the Prostitutes of Lhasa

A comfortable village was there
until the soldiers passed through,
leaving only a small house
for the nurse sent ahead
to betray the land.

A wounded soldier has only one nurse,
but a nurse has many soldiers—
like mirrors—
in which she every day
sees herself a little more clearly.

The dream battle is dangerous
when it replaces reality
and reason is dangerous
when it replaces love.

If a thing is in your heart then it is true;
if not, it becomes a ghost.
If your life is a collection of ghosts
your heart becomes impermanent.

During the war,
broken girls from the villages
would change their names
when they changed Flower Houses,
to resist the silent hauntings
of dead soldiers, left behind.


Copyright (c) 2004 by Tulku Urgyan Tenpa Rinpoche. Rights reserved.

Stumble Upon Toolbar

On this Tenth, the Twelfth


On this, the tenth day of the lunar month, I dedicate the Guru Rinpoche puja to the welfare of all sentient beings and His Eminence the Twelfth Trungpa Rinpoche, for whose long life and benefit I constantly pray.

For some reason, I am reminded of this one:

Dearly loved comrade,
If you do not hold the seat,
Others may take it away;
If you do not sit on a rock,
It becomes mushy clay;
If you don't have patience to sit on a rock or seat,
They give you away;
If you are not diligent in holding the throne,
Some opportunist will snatch it away;
If you are tired of your seat,
Some interior decorator will rearrange it;
If you don't have a throne,
You cannot speak or proclaim from it,
So the audience will dissipate;
If you don't have a government seat to sit on,
Your wisdom and command seal will be snatched by others;
If you run around, thinking that you have a seat to come back to,
It will be washed away by the turbulent river,
Like a presidential platform;
You can never proclaim your command.
Either it will be disassembled by the cockroaches
Or the frivolous multitude will take it away as souvenirs.
It may be hard to sit on the seat,
But one must endure it.
Do sit on your seat,
Whether it is hard or soft.
Once you sit on your seat,
The sitting itself becomes truly command and message,
Then, undoubtedly, multitudes of people will respect and obey it
As the vajra throne of Bodhgaya where Buddha taught.
Truth becomes exertion.
The message of hard fact proclaims itself,
So you don't have to emphasize harder truth.
Offering your seat in order to please others will not give authentic
reward
They will take the attitude that you are a pleasant seat-offerer.
So, my son, please don't move around;
Assume your seat, and sit, and be.
If you be that way, truth prevails;
Command is heard throughout the land.
So sit and hold your seat.
Then you will enjoy, because others will admire you.
This is hard to do, but easy to accomplish.

12 June 1981


Stumble Upon Toolbar

Friday, September 21, 2007

Economic Intelligence

In private emails with several interested parties, we've been hashing over the question of how to finance Tibetan Buddhism in the decades to come. One correspondent wrote with words to the effect of, "say something simple about this."

I wish it were simple.

In the 1960s, when we really began to work on this problem, we began with absolutely nothing. Our first task was to attract manpower, and in the execution of this task we were successful. We were young, full of energy, and we worked hard.

One of the biggest engines we had was publishing. Publishing revenues drove rapid expansion, and rapid expansion drove expectations. We dreamed up bigger and bigger projects. Rather fatally, we started sending money overseas, and this raised the level of expectation to even greater heights.

The next big engine was an economic boom in Southeast Asia. The Taiwanese started throwing money at Tibetan Buddhism like nobody ever saw.

The third big engine was the seasoning of our constituents. They matured into their careers, and the kids who once scrambled for nickels and dimes were suddenly in a position to do something substantial.

These three engines pulled us through the 1970s, 1980s, and early 1990s. It was a wonderful time to be in the West, where anything was possible.


But you know, things change.


The publishing paradigm has changed. It is now a digital world, but our publishing organs haven't geared up for digital content delivery. There are more books being pushed to a shrinking market, while only a trickle reaches the growing market which is moving away.

The overseas economy changed. The legendary Taiwanese Buddhist millionaires are now few and far between.

Our constituents continued to age. Most are now in retirement, living on fixed incomes, back to square one.

The other factor is, of course, that many of the great teachers died within the space of a few years: Trungpa Rinpoche, Kalu Rinpoche, Dudjom Rinpoche, Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche, H.H. Karmapa, and others.

In the void of the 1990s, foundations, groups, and projects proliferated. The overseas operations remained a black hole. The people in India thought the ride would last forever. Every time Joe Lama came back home with a bucket of foreign cash, it just made things worse, not better.

Shoddy management overseas burned money like juniper. Huge projects were commenced with no---repeat no---long range planning. Sure, we could build it, but how would we maintain it ten years in the future, twenty years in the future, thirty years in the future? What would the political climate be like?

We did not systematize. Sure, stupas are fun. But every time you build one, it is like the first one ever built. We need to build them 108 at a time. To me it is shocking that we have been in the U.S. for over 40 years, and we still do not have 108 (major) stupas in the whole country.

Second language programs in the monastic institutions were poorly conceived... driven by the perception of where the next big meal might be coming from. To me it is shocking that next-generation tulkus are coming here from India who barely speak English.

Full financial disclosure is difficult to come by, particularly with the overseas operations. The Western institutions are better (the law is strict here), but we still see weasel-language like, "in 200x we sent about umpteem thousand and our admin costs are about 10 percent..." What are we ashamed of? Publish the numbers for all to see.


There have been exceptions to all of the above---Tarthang Rinpoche's operations being a notable case in point, and a model of correct work---but these are only exceptions, not the rule. What adds to the injury is that we have seemingly learned nothing from our mistakes. We still crank up projects, flog the faithful, and watch the "drop" more carefully than a Las Vegas casino.

I truly believe we have to start consolidating in order to survive. I think we need to begin bringing in professionals to run the projects, and let the teachers go back to teaching. We have to cultivate the talent to create super-funds that sustain us far into the future. We have to put some of the money to work instead of burning more butter lamps.

There are also other issues to address. The Tibetans lost their country in 1959. The Vietnamese lost their country in 1975. Today, the Viet-Kieu are an economic force to be reckoned with, able to make their influence felt back home. The Tibetans, however, are still refugees--locked in ghettos, trained to rely on charity and dependent upon a "government in exile" that serves absolutely no useful political purpose whatsoever, and is itself reliant on charity.

These are such difficult words to write. These are such difficult words to read.

If these words offend anyone, I am so sorry, but alone among the great religions of the world, Tibetan Buddhism is financially still in the dark ages, depending on others instead of itself.

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Yeshe Tsogyal

Update: Someone kindly wrote to tell me that this image is by Cynthia Moku, who I seem to recall once lived with Lama Lodru, in San Francisco. This really magnificent likeness of Yeshe Tsogyal is available directly from her or from Shambala, where they have apparently fashioned it into one of their banners or something.


I want to tell you that when I saw this likeness it spoke to me with an ancient voice. I absolutely do commend the artist for producing this image. I think to be perfect, it should have some indication of water beneath the lotus.

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Explain Something to Me

If the United States Department of State, in its legally mandated report on religious freedom (see below), officially informs Congress and the President that China is torturing Tibetan Buddhist monks and nuns (see below), then will somebody please explain to me why this nation sits still and does nothing?

I h
ave posted the entire text of the State Department's report on Tibet for a reason: I want everyone who visits this site to see the truth of what Tibetan Buddhism is facing. It is my belief that unless something is done to mobilize China's estimated 100 million Buddhists, then Tibetan Buddhism as we understand it may no longer exist in Tibet within the next 25 years. Further, it is my belief that unless the West mobilizes all of its considerable resources, Tibetan Buddhism itself may well yet again face extinction within the next 50 years.

I used to believe th
at the efforts we commenced in the 1960s had produced rich fruit, and that we had "saved" Tibetan Buddhism. Today, in spite of the progress that has been made, I am less sanguine. Today, I seem to see that the job we began is not even half-finished.

I think we need to put more horsepower into infr
astructure projects in nations of safety. I think we need to put more horsepower into monastic education in the countries of first asylum. Candidly, I think the United States needs to take some of the burden away from India, and itself become a country of first asylum. I think we need to develop a global fund-raising mechanism that is strong enough to support the infrastructure which is already in place, and its anticipated expansion.

I urge you
again to read the entire text of the U.S. State Department's report, released earlier this week.

Stumble Upon Toolbar

State Dept Report on Religious Freedom in Tibet, 2007

TIBET

The United States recognizes the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR) and Tibetan autonomous counties and prefectures in other provinces to be a part of the People's Republic of China. The Department of State follows these designations in its reporting. The preservation and development of the Tibetan people's unique religious, cultural, and linguistic heritage and the protection of their fundamental human rights continue to be of concern.

The Constitution of the People's Republic of China provides for freedom of religious belief, although it limits protection of the exercise of religious belief to activities which the Government defines as "normal." The Government's 2005 White Paper on "Regional Autonomy for Ethnic Minorities in China" states, "Organs of self-government in autonomous areas, in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution and relevant laws, respect and guarantee the freedom of religious belief of ethnic minorities, and safeguard all legal and normal religious activities of people of ethnic minorities." However, the Government maintained tight controls on religious practices and places of worship. Although the authorities permitted many traditional religious practices and public manifestations of belief, they promptly and forcibly suppressed activities they viewed as vehicles for political dissent or advocacy of Tibetan independence, such as religious activities venerating the Dalai Lama (which the Government described as "splittist").

Overall, during the period of the report the level of repression remained high, and the Government's record of respect for religious freedom remained poor; however, the atmosphere for religious freedom varied from region to region. Conditions were generally more relaxed in Tibetan autonomous areas outside the region, with the exception of parts of Sichuan's Kardze Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture. A sixth round of discussions between envoys of the Dalai Lama and Chinese Government officials began June 29. The Dalai Lama's envoys made previous visits to China for discussions in 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2006 and in 2005 met with Government officials in Switzerland. Although the Government has refused to engage in direct discussions with the Dalai Lama, it continued to assert that the door to dialogue and negotiation was open, provided that the Dalai Lama publicly affirmed that Tibet and Taiwan were inseparable parts of China.

Although in the past there were reports of the deaths of monks and nuns due to maltreatment in prison, there were no known reports of deaths due to maltreatment in prison during the period covered by this report. Buddhist nun Kelsang Namtso was shot and killed at the Nangpa La pass on September 30, 2006, by Chinese border guards as she and a group of 70 Tibetans attempted to cross into Nepal. Buddhist leaders such as Gendun Choekyi Nyima and Tenzin Delek remained in detention or prison, and central figures in Tibetan Buddhism such as the Dalai Lama and the Karmapa Lama remained in exile. Dozens of monks and nuns continued to serve prison terms for their resistance to "patriotic" or political education. The Government refused free access to Tibetan areas for international observers, tightly controlled observers who were granted access, and tightly controlled publication of information about conditions in the region. These restrictions made it impossible to determine accurately the scope of religious freedom violations.

There were no reports of societal abuses or discrimination based on religious belief or practice.

Diplomats and nongovernmental organizations NGOs advocated for international access to Gendun Choekyi Nyima, whom the overwhelming majority of Tibetan Buddhists continued to recognize as the Panchen Lama, and urged the Chinese Government to pursue dialogue with the Dalai Lama and his representatives.

The U.S. Government continued to encourage greater religious freedom by urging the Government and local authorities to respect religious freedom and preserve religious traditions. The U.S. Government protested credible reports of religious persecution and discrimination, discussed specific cases with the authorities, and requested further information about specific incidents.

Section I. Religious Demography

The Tibetan areas of China have an area of 871,649 square miles. According to the 2000 census, the Tibetan population of those areas was 5.4 million; the Tibetan population within the TAR was 2.4 million, while in autonomous prefectures and counties outside the TAR the Tibetan population was 2.9 million. Most practiced Tibetan Buddhism, although a sizeable minority also practiced traditional Bon religion. This held true for many Tibetan government officials and Communist Party members. Other residents of Tibetan areas who were religious believers included Han Chinese, who practiced Buddhism, Daoism, Confucianism, and traditional folk religions; Hui Muslims; Tibetan Muslims; and Christians. There are four mosques in the TAR with approximately 4,000 to 5,000 Muslim adherents, as well as a Catholic church with 560 parishioners, which is located in the traditionally Catholic community of Yanjing in the eastern TAR. There were a small number of Falun Gong adherents in the TAR.

The number of monks and nuns in the TAR fluctuated significantly in the late 1990s due to continuing enforcement of the "patriotic education campaign" and expulsion from monasteries and nunneries of many monks and nuns who refused to denounce the Dalai Lama or who were found to be "politically unqualified." Since 1996, the Government has reported that there are 46,000 monks and nuns and 1,700 religious sites in the TAR, but this figure has likely varied over time due to continued politically motivated detentions as well as monastic secularization and commercialization caused by tourism. The Government figure of 46,000 monks and nuns represented only the TAR, where the number of monks and nuns was very strictly controlled. According to statistics collected by the China Center for Tibetan Studies, a government research institution, there were 1,535 monasteries in Tibetan areas outside the TAR. Informed observers estimated that a total of 60,000 Tibetan Buddhist monks and nuns lived in Tibetan areas outside the TAR.

There are some unregistered Protestant churches or "house churches" in the TAR.

Missionaries were present.

Section II. Status of Religious Freedom

Legal/Policy Framework

The Constitution of the People's Republic of China provides for freedom of religious belief and the freedom not to believe; however, the Government sought to restrict religious practice to government-sanctioned organizations and registered places of worship and to control the growth and scope of the activity of religious groups. The Government remained wary of Tibetan Buddhism in general and its links to the Dalai Lama, and it maintained tight controls on religious practices and places of worship in Tibetan areas. Although authorities permitted many traditional religious practices and public manifestations of belief, they promptly and forcibly suppressed any activities which they viewed as vehicles for political dissent. This included religious activities that officials perceived as supporting the Dalai Lama or Tibetan independence.

According to Chinese news reports, Zhang Qingli, the Secretary of the Communist Party in the TAR, announced his intention to intensify strict political control over Buddhist practice at a meeting of Communist party officials in mid 2006. According to the reports, Zhang referred to a life or death struggle against the Dalai Lama and his "clique," and referred to them as the "biggest obstacle hindering Tibetan Buddhism from establishing normal order."

TAR officials in September 2006 released the "Implementation Regulations on the Religious Affairs Regulations." The 56-article regulation took effect on January 1, 2007. The new regulations cover management of religious groups, religious venues, and religious personnel. According to Chinese media reports, the regulation will play an important role in resisting the "Dalai Clique's separatist activities." The 2007 Regulations supersede the 1991 regulations on religion in the TAR. The 2007 Regulations increase the Government's control over the movement of nuns and monks by requiring that they seek permission from county level officials to travel to another county. The previous regulations only required monks and nuns to seek travel permission if they were visiting another province.

According to the educational practices of Tibetan Buddhism, monks and nuns must travel to receive specialized training from teachers who are considered experts in their particular theological traditions. The International Campaign for Tibet (ICT) has reported that monks and nuns who reach India claim that their main reason for choosing to leave Tibet, even temporarily, is to continue their studies, which they are unable to do inside Tibet, and to obtain a blessing from the Dalai Lama. According to Article 13 of the new regulations, religious organizations must petition the Government's religious affairs department in order to build religious structures. If individuals build a religious structure without authorization, the religious affairs department may demolish the structure.

In April 2007 the official website of the Kardze Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture reported that during Kardze's Tenth Five-Year Plan the prefecture government will make proposal and approval procedures for new building, relocation, or expansion of religious venues more strict. According to the website, monastic construction carried out without official approval will be stopped. The prefecture government will further strengthen management of monks and nuns exiting and entering the prefecture. In addition, the Government will further strengthen "antiseparatist work in religious circles."

The Government had the right to disapprove any individual's application to take up religious orders. In practice many monks study and worship within their monasteries without being "registered" or obtaining an official monastic identification card issued by religious affairs authorities. Authorities curtailed the traditional practice of sending young boys to monasteries for religious training by means of regulations that forbade monasteries from accepting individuals under the age of 18. Nevertheless, some monasteries continued to admit younger boys, often delaying their formal registration until the age of 18. In two different monasteries outside the TAR, the number of unregistered young monks rose into the thousands.

Restrictions on Religious Freedom

Government officials closely associated Buddhist monasteries with proindependence activism in Tibetan areas of China. Spiritual leaders encountered difficulty reestablishing historical monasteries due to lack of funds, general limitations on monastic education, and denials of government permission to build and operate religious institutions, which officials in some areas contended were a drain on local resources and a conduit for political infiltration by the Tibetan exile community. While some monasteries destroyed during the Cultural Revolution have been rebuilt or repaired, many have not and others remained only partially repaired. The Government stated that funding restoration efforts was done to support the practice of religion, but it also was done in part to promote the development of tourism in Tibetan areas. Most recent restoration efforts were funded privately, although a few religious sites also were receiving government support for reconstruction projects at the end of the period covered by this report.

The Government stated that there were no limits on the number of monks in major monasteries and that each monastery's Democratic Management Committee (DMC) decided independently how many monks the monastery could support. Many of these committees were government-controlled, and in practice the Government imposed strict limits on the number of monks in major monasteries, particularly in the TAR.

The Government continued to oversee the daily operations of major monasteries. The Government, which did not contribute to the monasteries' operating funds, retained management control of monasteries through the DMCs and local religious affairs bureaus. Regulations restricted leadership of many DMCs to "patriotic and devoted" monks and nuns and specified that the Government must approve all members of the committees. At some monasteries, government officials were members of the committees.

The quality and availability of high-level religious teachers in the TAR and other Tibetan areas remained inadequate; many teachers were in exile, older teachers were not being replaced, and those remaining in Tibetan areas outside the TAR had difficulty securing permission to teach in the TAR. In recent years, DMCs at several large monasteries began to use funds generated by the sales of entrance tickets or donated by pilgrims for purposes other than the support of monks engaged in full-time religious study. As a result, some "scholar monks" who had formerly been fully supported had to engage in income-generating activities. Some experts were concerned that, as a result, fewer monks would be qualified to serve as teachers in the future. While local government officials' attempts to attract tourists to religious sites provided some monasteries with extra income, they also deflected time and energy from religious instruction. In July 2004 authorities permitted resumption of the Geshe Lharampa examinations, the highest religious examination in the Gelug sect of Tibetan Buddism, at Lhasa's Jokhang Temple for the first time in 16 years. The exam has new political content that is unrelated to the test's historical religious content. According to officials in the TAR, seven monks in the TAR passed the Geshe Lharampa exam in 2006. The Great Prayer Festival, or Monlam Chenmo, traditionally closely associated with the Geshe exam process, has been banned each year since 1988. Foreign academics reported that some monasteries still forbid monks from taking the Geshe Lharampa exams. Practically, it is also difficult for monks to receive the level of instruction necessary to even take the Geshe Lharampa exam. Monks who wished to sit the exam traditionally traveled to the TAR to study at monasteries such as Sera and Drepung monasteries. However, movement of monks from one monastery to another for study is now extremely difficult, especially for monks from outside the TAR who wish to study at monasteries inside the TAR.

Official Chinese-language press reports emphasized the importance and strengthening of monastic patriotic education. Reports also stated political education was necessary for the whole society to be vigilant towards combating "splittism" and the influence of the "Dalai Clique." The primary responsibility for conducting monastic political education remained with monastery leaders, and the form, content, and frequency of training at each monastery appeared to vary widely; however, conducting such training remained a requirement and is a routine part of monastic management. In some monasteries outside the TAR, political education sessions were held infrequently.

The Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees reported that 2,405 Tibetans arrived at the Tibet Reception Center (TRC) in Nepal in 2006, compared with 3,395 in 2005. During the year departures were higher than arrivals, with 2,946 Tibetans departing the TRC for India. This was due to a backlog of Tibetans being able to depart for India at the end of 2005.

Many Tibetans, particularly those from rural areas both inside and outside the TAR, continued to report difficulties obtaining passports. The application process was not transparent, and residents of different Tibetan areas reported obstacles ranging from bureaucratic inefficiency and corruption to denials based on the applicant's political activities or religious beliefs. Due in part to the difficulties faced by many Tibetans in obtaining passports, and in part to the difficulty many Chinese citizens of Tibetan ethnicity encountered obtaining entry visas for India, it was difficult for Tibetans to travel to India for religious purposes. Nevertheless, thousands of Tibetans, including monks and nuns, visited India via third countries. The number of Tibetans who returned to China after temporary stays in India is unknown.

The Government placed restrictions on the movement of Tibetans during sensitive anniversaries and events and increased controls over border areas at these times. In December 2006 the TAR Government announced a stepped-up "anti-illegal border crossing campaign" targeting Tibetans seeking to go to India through Nepal. There were reports that Tibetans trying to cross the border illegally were detained for several months, although in most cases no formal charges were brought. There were also reports of the torture of persons, particularly monks, returning from Nepal and India and reports that government officials asked family members for bribes in exchange for the release of returnees. In September 2006 a 17 year-old nun was fatally shot by Chinese border guards while she was attempting to cross into Nepal with an estimated 70 other Tibetans at the Nangpa La Pass. Approximately half of the group, which included a number of children, was taken into custody, while at least 43 made it to Nepal. The Government reported the release of those taken into custody a few months later. Returned exiles reported that authorities pressured them not to discuss issues that the Government characterized as politically sensitive, such as the Dalai Lama.

The Karmapa, leader of Tibetan Buddhism's Karma Kagyu sect and one of the most influential religious figures in Tibetan Buddhism, remained in exile following his 1999 flight to India. The Karmapa stated that he fled because of the Government's controls on his movements and its refusal either to allow him to go to India to be trained by his spiritual mentors or to allow his teachers to come to him. Visitors to Tsurphu Monastery, the seat of the Karmapa, noted that the population of monks remained small and the atmosphere was subdued.

The Government routinely asserted control over the process of identifying and educating reincarnated lamas. For example, the Government authorities closely supervised the current Reting Rinpoche, who is eight years old, and his education differed significantly from that of his predecessors.

The Government also strictly restricted contacts between reincarnate lamas and the outside world. For example, young incarnate lama Pawo Rinpoche, who was recognized by the Karmapa in 1994, lived under government supervision at Nenang Monastery. Foreign delegations have been refused permission to visit him.

Government officials maintained that possessing or displaying pictures of the Dalai Lama was not illegal and that most TAR residents chose not to display his picture. Nevertheless, authorities appeared to view possession of such photos as evidence of separatist sentiment when detaining individuals on political charges. Article 34 of the 2007 "TAR Measures for Implementation of the 'Regulations for Religious Affairs'" states that "religious personnel and religious citizens may not distribute books, pictures, or other materials which harm the unity of the nationalities or endanger state security." Photos or books of the Dalai Lama fall into this category. Pictures of the Dalai Lama were not openly displayed in major monasteries and could not be purchased openly in the TAR. In Tibetan areas outside the TAR, visitors to several monasteries saw pictures of the Dalai Lama openly displayed. Amnesty International reports that a former monk, Sonam Gyalpo, was sentenced to 12 years' imprisonment in mid-2006 for "endangering state security" after videos of the Dalai Lama were found in his house.

The Government continued to ban pictures of Gendun Choekyi Nyima, the man recognized by the Dalai Lama as the Panchen Lama. Photos of the "official" Panchen Lama, Gyaltsen Norbu, were not publicly displayed in most places, most likely because most Tibetans refuse to recognize him as the Panchen Lama.

Many Tibetan Buddhist religious figures held positions in local People's Congresses and committees of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, which do not require Communist Party membership. Some religious figures accepted political positions in order to protect their monasteries, and some Tibetan officials openly practiced Buddhism. The Government continued to insist, however, that Communist Party members and senior employees adhere to the Party's code of atheism, and routine political training for cadres continued to denigrate religious belief and promote atheism. Government officials confirmed that some Religious Affairs Bureau (RAB) officers were members of the Communist Party and that religious belief was incompatible with Party membership.

Security was intensified during the Dalai Lama's birthday, sensitive anniversaries, and festival days in the TAR and in some other Tibetan areas. The prohibition on celebrating the Dalai Lama's birthday on July 6 continued. In December 2006 the government banned participation of government cadres, workers and students in the Ganden Ngamcho festival. In March 2007 authorities in Lhasa heightened security in major monasteries in order to control gatherings celebrating the long life of the Dalai Lama. The Government reportedly altered traditional dates of Tibetan festivals such as the Drepunb Shodon Festival. Some government employees were told that they would lose their jobs or have their wages reduced if they disobeyed this order. According to the Tibetan Centre for Human Rights and Democracy, Lhasa City school children were prohibited from participating in religious activities during the holy month of Saka Dawa, which takes place in the fourth month of the Lunar calendar.

Travel restrictions for foreign visitors to and within the TAR were reported during the period covered by this report and the Government tightly controlled visits by foreign officials to religious sites in the TAR.

Some foreign religious workers were expelled from the TAR during the reporting period.

Abuses of Religious Freedom

The Government strictly controlled access to and information about Tibetan areas, particularly the TAR, and it was difficult to determine accurately the scope of religious freedom violations. There were reports that the atmosphere for lay religious practice in Tibetan areas was more restrictive than in the recent past. The Government's record of respect for religious freedom remained poor during the period covered by this report.

The Panchen Lama is Tibetan Buddhism's second most prominent figure, after the Dalai Lama. The Government continued to refuse to allow access to Gendun Choekyi Nyima, the man recognized as the 11th Panchen Lama by the Dalai Lama in 1995 (when he was six years old). Government officials claimed he was under government supervision, at an undisclosed location, for his own protection and attends classes as a "normal schoolboy." All requests from the international community for access to him to confirm his well-being have been refused. Nyima turned 18 on April 25, 2007. The Government continued to insist that Gyaltsen Norbu, seventeen, the boy it selected in 1995, was the Panchen Lama's eleventh reincarnation.

The Government did not provide any information on Lama Chadrel Rinpoche, who was reportedly still under house arrest near Lhasa for leaking information about the selection of the Panchen Lama.

Officials did not provide any new information on Champa Chung, former assistant of Chadrel Rinpoche who was reportedly still held in custody since the expiration of his prison term in 1999.

Limited access to information about prisoners and prisons made it difficult to ascertain the number of Tibetan prisoners of conscience or to assess the extent and severity of abuses. According to the Congressional Executive Commission on China Political Prisoner Database (CECC PPD), as of April 2007 there were 99 Tibetan prisoners of conscience, 76 of whom were monks and nuns. The CECC reported that the number of prisoners of conscience declined to less than one-fifth the number 10 years ago.

Approximately 46 prisoners of conscience remained in prison in Lhasa, most serving sentences on the charge of "counterrevolution," which was dropped from the criminal law in 1997. Authorities have stated that acts previously prosecuted as counterrevolutionary crimes continue to be considered crimes under state security laws.

In January 2007 Radio Free Asia (RFA) reported the arrest of Penpa, a village leader from Dhingri County near Shigatse in the TAR. Chinese police were reported to have searched Penpa's home and found materials relating to the 2005 Kalachakara teachings of the Dalai Lama. In March 2007, the Tibet Information Network (TIN) reported that Penpa was sentenced in February to serve 3 years in Nyari Prison in Shigatse. The charges against Penpa were unknown.

In May 2007 the head of the large Dungkyab Monastery in Qinghai was forced to step down after he refused to sign a document condemning the Dalai Lama. According to a Radio Free Asia report, Khenpo Tsanor would not sign a government document which stated that the Dalai Lama should be criticized and his "splittist" behavior condemned, even though Tsanor knew he might be killed or imprisoned.

Destruction of monastic residences and expulsion of monks and nuns continued at Yachen Monastery in Kardze Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture in Sichuan Province.

In May 2007, the Tibetan Centre for Human Rights and Democracy (TCHRD) reported that a number of restrictions were imposed on religious observance of Saka Dawa, the birth of the Buddha, celebrated on April 15. TCHRD reported that the Lhasa City Committee ordered children not visit monasteries, circumambulate, or wear amulet thread during Saka Dawa. The Committee threatened the children with expulsion from school.

The Lhasa Governor's office and the Lhasa City Party Secretary prohibited Party members, civil servants and staff from participating in or even observing the activities of the Ganden Ngamcho anniversary. Party members were threatened with demotions and salary cuts if they did not comply with the order. Small farmers were also reportedly banned from selling incense and juniper leaves for religious purposes on religious days.

During Saka Dawa in April 2007, the Chinese People's Armed Police (PAP) destroyed a statue of Guru Padmasambava (known as Guru Rinpoche) at Samye Monastery. The rubble from the statue was reportedly being transferred to an unknown location. After the destruction of the statue, the PAP reportedly surrounded the monastery. The statue was built with private donations of 800 thousand yuan from Chinese Buddhists. An official at the monastery referred to the new religious affairs regulations which state that a new religious structure cannot be built without official consent.

Chinese border guards shot and killed Buddhist nun Kelsang Namtso at the Nangpa La Pass between Tibet and Nepal on September 30, 2006. She was with a group of 70 Tibetans who were attempting to cross into Nepal. The Government said that the Tibetans were illegal border crossers. Forty-three Tibetans from the group are known to have arrived safely in exile, however, at least 25 others, including a number of young children, were taken into custody by the PAP. A professional Romanian cameraman and climber who happened to be in the area at the time was able to film the incident which clearly showed the Tibetans where not armed and were fired on from the back.

In June 2006 authorities in Sichuan's Kardze Prefecture initiated a political reeducation campaign for children at the Kardze Tibetan Middle School following a call by the Dalai Lama for Tibetans to stop wearing animal skins in their traditional clothing. Soldiers in uniform entered the school and said that Tibetans were not permitted to wear animal skins. They reportedly asked students whether they supported the Dalai Lama. Those who said they did not were encouraged to trample a picture of the Dalai Lama. A 16-year old girl named Yiwang was detained and was still being held without charge as of April 2007.

In June 2006 RFA reported that authorities detained five Tibetans, including two Buddhist nuns from Kardze Prefecture, for allegedly handing out leaflets promoting Tibetan independence. In Lhasa, Yiga, a nun, and two other women, Sonam Choetso and Jampa Yangtso, were reportedly detained on the first day of the Saka Dawa religious period on May 28, 2006. Kayi Doega and Sonam Lhamo, a nun, were reportedly detained in Kardze Prefecture on June 1 and June 2, 2006 respectively, on suspicion of organizing the leafleting.

On August 15, 2006, police in Kardze County detained Lobsang Paldan, a 22-year-old monk from Kardze Monastery. He was sentenced to 4 years imprisonment. The charges were unknown. Seven other monks from Kardze Monastery whose names were unknown were also arrested in August 2006 and were still in prison at the end of the reporting period.

According to a report by Radio Free Asia (RFA), on August 23, 2006, security officials arrested Jinpa, a reincarnate lama and the abbot of Choktsang Taklung Monastery in Ganzi Prefecture, Sichuan Province. Jinpa was reportedly arrested on suspicion of involvement in displaying proindependence posters at the monastery.

In late 2006 the Government released Nun Yonten Drolma, also known as Yonten Tsomo, from prison. She was detained with two other Tibetan nuns and two monks for distributing letters calling for Tibetan independence.

At the end of 2006, the Government also released monks Tashi Gyaltsen, Tsultrim Phelgyal, Tsesum Samten, and Lobsang Thargyal from Treldzong. They were from Dakar Treldzong Monastery in Qinghai Province and were arrested in 2005 for publishing politically sensitive poems. Jhamphel Gyatso, a monk who was arrested with them, is still detained and is serving a 4- to 5-year sentence. The charges are unknown.

Prison authorities continued to subject imprisoned monks and nuns to torture.

After her release to the United States in March 2006 on medical parole, Tibetan Buddhist nun Phuntsog Nyidrol reported that she was tortured by government authorities. Phuntsog Nyidrol also stated that religious prisoners are not allowed to meet with other religious prisoners, use their religious names in prison, or recite prayers in prison. Phuntsog Nyidrol also stated that prison administrators deny family visits to religious prisoners as punishment.

There was no new information on Gendun, a Tibetan monk and teacher of traditional monastic dance from Yulung Monastery in Qinghai. In April 2006 TIN reported that Gendun had been sentenced in January 2006 to 4 years in prison after he gave talks about Tibetan culture and history. The charges against him were unknown.

Lhasa orphanage owners Bangri Chogtrul Rinpoche (Jigme Tenzin Nyima) and Nyima Choedron were convicted in 2002 of "espionage and endangering state security." In March 2006 Bangri Chogrul's life sentence was commuted to a fixed term of 19 years, due to be completed in 2021. Nyima Choedron was released early on February 26, 2006.

In early October 2005 Ngawang Jangchub, a 28-year-old Tibetan monk, was found dead in his room at the Drepung Monastery in Lhasa. According to reports, Ngawang Jangchub's death followed a heated dispute with the monastery's "work team" over his refusal to denounce the Dalai Lama. Government officials claimed Ngawang Jangchub's death was due to natural causes.

According to the Tibetan Centre for Human Rights and Democracy (TCHRD), authorities arrested five monks who refused to take part in patriotic education that began in October 2005 at the Drepung Monastery in Lhasa. The monks, who were identified as Ngawang Namdrol, Ngawang Nyingpo, Ngawang Thupten, Ngawang Phelgey, and Phuntsok Thupwang, reportedly refused to denounce the Dalai Lama and recognize Tibet as part of China. TAR officials said that the monks were not detained but rather expelled from the monastery. The officials acknowledged that hundreds of monks gathered to petition for their return.

A number of former political prisoners and other suspected activists were reportedly detained in the period prior to the 40th anniversary of the founding of the TAR on September 1, 2005. According to Human Rights Watch, Sonam, a monk from the Potala Palace, was detained by security forces in August 2005. In September 2005, another monk, Sonam Gyalpo, was arrested on charges of separating the country and destroying national unity.

In mid-2005 Tibetan Buddhist monks Dzokar and Topden and layman Lobsang Tsering from Sichuan's Kardze Prefecture were released after serving a portion of a 3-year jail term for putting up proindependence posters.

In March 2005 the World Tibet Network News (WTN) reported that local authorities extended Tibetan Buddhist monk Jigme Gyatso's prison sentence for alleged "political activities" from 15 to 17 years.

In January 2005 the Government commuted the death sentence of Tenzin Delek to life in prison. In 2002 Tenzin Delek, a prominent lama from Kardze, was arrested for his alleged connection with a series of bombings in Sichuan Province. On January 26, 2003, Tenzin Delek and his associate, Lobsang Dondrub, were sentenced to death for their alleged role in the bombings. The Government executed Lobsang Dondrub the same day despite reportedly giving assurances to senior diplomatic officials that both accused would be afforded due process and that their sentences would be reviewed by the national-level Supreme People's Court. Tenzin Delek was being held in Tuandong Prison in Sichuan Province.

The status of Phutnsok Tsering in Magar Dhargyeling Monastery in the TAR, who was arrested in 2005, for possessing a portrait of the Dalai Lama and writings on Tibetan nationalism, remained unknown.

There was no new information on the whereabouts of the two Tibetan nuns and two Tibetan monks who were detained along with Yonten Drolma (who was released in late 2006). According to the London-based Free Tibet Campaign, authorities in Gansu Province arrested the group in May 2005 for distributing letters at a local monastery, market, and other areas calling for Tibetan independence. The Congressional Executive Commission on China Political Prisoner Database (CECC PPD) also listed monk Sherab as being detained as part of this group.

The whereabouts of monk Jigme Dasang from Kumbum Monastery in Qinghai who was detained in June 2005 were still unknown.

The Government did not provide any new information on the report that police in Qinghai's Golog Prefecture shot and killed Tibetan Buddhist religious leader Shetsul in October 2004 after he and other monks demanded police pay for medical treatment for injuries suffered while in custody.

The status of the following persons remained unconfirmed at the end of the reporting period: two monks from Sichuan's Kardze Prefecture who were arrested in 2004 for displaying the Tibetan national flag and Choeden Rinzen, who was arrested in 2004 for possessing a Tibetan national flag and a picture of the Dalai Lama.

Forced Religious Conversion

There were no reports of forced religious conversion, including of minor U.S. citizens who had been abducted or illegally removed from the United States, or of the Government's refusal to allow such citizens to be returned to the United States.

Section III. Societal Abuses and Discrimination

Most Tibetans practice Tibetan Buddhism. While there was some friction between Tibetan Buddhists and the growing Muslim Hui population in cities of the Tibetan areas, it was attributable more to economic competition and cultural differences than to religious tensions.

Section IV. U.S. Government Policy

The U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Embassy in Beijing, and the U.S. consulate general in Chengdu made a concerted effort to encourage greater religious freedom in Tibetan areas, using focused external pressure regarding abuses. In regular exchanges, including with religious affairs officials, U.S. diplomatic personnel consistently urged both the Government and local authorities to respect religious freedom in Tibetan areas.

Embassy and consulate officials protested and sought further information on cases whenever there were credible reports of religious persecution or discrimination. In 2006, officials asked for and were denied a meeting in Lhasa with Chadrel Rinpoche, reportedly under house arrest since 2002.

U.S. diplomatic personnel stationed in the country maintained contacts with a wide range of religious leaders and practitioners in the Tibetan areas, and they traveled regularly to the TAR and other Tibetan areas to monitor the status of religious freedom. The ability of U.S. diplomatic personnel to travel freely and talk to people at ease while in the area was extremely limited. Not all requests to travel to Tibetan areas were granted.

U.S. development and exchange programs aim to strengthen Tibetan communities in China and preserve their environmental and cultural heritage. Both are inextricably linked to Tibet's Buddhist religious tradition. In Tibetan Buddhism, there is a tradition of designating mountains, forests, and other physical spaces as being endowed with some spiritual significance. Monasteries have traditionally played a major role in managing the local habitat around them as a result. The Dalai Lama has also strongly encouraged Tibetans to be good stewards of the environment. The U.S. diplomatic mission in China has also promoted religious dialogue through its exchange visitor program, which financed the travel of several prominent scholars of traditional Tibetan culture and religion to the United States.


Released on September 14, 2007

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Read Them and Weep

Suddenly, the fire is 93% contained, at a revised total of a little over 14,000 acres. Rather singularly, a hail storm materialized out of a clear sky, directly over the fire today. Further snow flurries....yes, snow flurries...are predicted for tonight. Meteorologists are at a loss to explain these local weather anomalies.

Then there is the issue of the young Nyingma monk in need of a kidney transplant. We wrote about this yesterday, asking for your help, and you responded splendidly. Today, we received this update from one of the involved parties:

"Late last night, by some magic, the paperwork tunneled its way from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs back to the Indian Embassy... ."

This is what happens when people of good will, working together for the welfare of others, apply themselves to virtuous purpose.

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Nye Noona

http://nyenoona.wordpress.com/

This is a personal web log with a Buddhist perspective that I tend to enjoy reading. Perhaps you will enjoy it as well.

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Thursday, September 20, 2007

Help Save A Young Monk's Life: Now


One of H.H. Penor Rinpoche's monks, a young man named Karma Yolmo, urgently requires a kidney transplant as a matter of life or death. Apparently, everything is ready, save for one last minute obstacle.

Karma Yolmo is a Nepali national and the operation is to be performed in India. The Indian Embassy at Kathmandu is reportedly experiencing some difficulty expediting this matter.

Perhaps they are unaware that this is a humanitarian issue of international interest.

His Excellency Shiva Shankar Mukharjee is the Ambassador of India to Nepal. The email addresss is consular@eoiktm.org

Please join me in contacting the Ambassador, politely and most respectfully requesting him to expedite the travel formalities for Karma Yolmo as a humanitarian issue. You should send me a copy at rinpoche@nyingmapa.us

There is a site explaining Karma Yolmo's situation at http://help4karma.terapad.com/

Please take a moment and show what people around the world can do when a Tibetan Buddhist monk needs a helping hand.

Stumble Upon Toolbar